By definition not so.
Paul Krugman
But meek to the geek.*
Speaking of which I have been under the weather for a week.
Speaking of anecdotal.
BTW: it is cloudy out, that makes me a meteorologist.
P.S. to be accurate apparently the exception proves the rule.
i.e. one error makes a counter case
* self acclaimed geek, Rachel, out geeks the more political than meek geek, Bill Nye, the Science Guy. Leaving his lesson lamer** then Rachel in the case of explaining why it snows more when it is warmer. Also anecdotal but none the less relevant, it was melting!
** Lame! A favorite refrain from Almost Live.
[2-12-10: as of 11:15 AM PST in latest email]
[Flagrant(oops)Footnote: Are your galoshes on yet FAUX NEWS?]
[Closing the Tetrahedron: Republican Medicare(Krugman), Supreme Correction, Senate Add Justmeant, Re: Sources. (PBMP)]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query PBMP. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query PBMP. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Follow-up and Flip-Flop
(THIS MATERIAL has been lifted (cut and pasted)from my previous post, to clean it up a bit.)
QCON: Apparently there is no big thing about holding to one's words. But I will try to work harder and consider this a memo to self or is it another tangent?
Speaking of tangents: what about the tetrahedron? [**] -
PBMP
[**] ALSO UPDATED: "to be added phoney or funny to political points" as in
[1. Physical
2. Psychological
3. Philosophical
4. Political
(power loop of phony and funny or what will happen) ]
[And a final update to date: embedded loopiness and links]
Hence the battle over not just temper but meant and there4 humor's another battle field, not counting Dangerfield.]
QCON: Apparently there is no big thing about holding to one's words. But I will try to work harder and consider this a memo to self or is it another tangent?
Speaking of tangents: what about the tetrahedron? [**] -
PBMP
[**] ALSO UPDATED: "to be added phoney or funny to political points" as in
[1. Physical
2. Psychological
3. Philosophical
4. Political
(power loop of phony and funny or what will happen) ]
[And a final update to date: embedded loopiness and links]
Hence the battle over not just temper but meant and there4 humor's another battle field, not counting Dangerfield.]
Saturday, December 01, 2012
December 3G FOOTNOTES
12-21-12 so far so good: but speaking of (fn) leap, my Android(3G)+ needs to be picked up from the morgue, as it's software has been declared inoperable.
Now for the relevant (fn)footnote(III):
(b.s. "golden"+"rule")
C#PO(correction) C3PO (see pound p.o.)or(D-cap it toll ization)
The Golden Rule (in Progress) (note heading scroll conflict/contrast)
Running on What? Rhetorical Slipperiness. (ibid.)
What, Me Worry? (ibid.)
The 1st thing that went wrong. (Re:boot AlGoreRhythm)
Tetra Heed Ron (#?! ibid.)
Inconvenient Segue (?)
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Hi Ate Us (yeah right Sea Scroll Conflict)
Ideology (fn ibid.)
Justice? (ibid.)
On the level... (really?)
Just to clarify... (reducks)
Taking the Bear by the Horns! (Re:Mitt-Flop)
The Tetrahedron Ramble* (ouch)
The Mess Age is the Message! (PBMP)
"whatsoever a man soweth" (is it alive?)
Stuart Smally Anyone? (or Frank'N) Sign?
(Mess N w/ # sines) [!(fn)4]
+( )leap from (fn)footnote I to III.
12-18-12 "buying a stairway" : (fn*) tba 2nd line: figures of speech
BTW: It's official. My Android(LG), may it Rest in Peace.(Optimus software repair failed).
12-5-12 Joke of the Year!
ALSO Re:"time" will expire.
time= (b.s.) "will+expire"
a, b(Reading between the lines.), c(Avian update), d(4g?), e.(?) [OW!](local sports)
12-3-12 Fiddle Sticks
(under Kant-struction)
[[That's the ticket! But this is a preemptive read. Support for raising taxes on the rich even runs over the barrier Republicans have constructed with their new minority of obstruction, except for their "arithmetic" and Twain. Actually the link at TED did not cover the error that is made when comparing percentiles with shares, or per capita with any tiles and individuals with dollars. Where4, there is more money in the top 1% therefore the top 1% are going to be paying a greater share of the taxes. Not to be competing with TED, but that means a progressive tax will look more unfair the more unfair income distribution is, unless you have a regressive tax.]]
Now for the relevant (fn)footnote(III):
(b.s. "golden"+"rule")
C#PO(correction) C3PO (see pound p.o.)or(D-cap it toll ization)
The Golden Rule (in Progress) (note heading scroll conflict/contrast)
Running on What? Rhetorical Slipperiness. (ibid.)
What, Me Worry? (ibid.)
The 1st thing that went wrong. (Re:boot AlGoreRhythm)
Tetra Heed Ron (#?! ibid.)
Inconvenient Segue (?)
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Hi Ate Us (yeah right Sea Scroll Conflict)
Ideology (fn ibid.)
Justice? (ibid.)
On the level... (really?)
Just to clarify... (reducks)
Taking the Bear by the Horns! (Re:Mitt-Flop)
The Tetrahedron Ramble* (ouch)
The Mess Age is the Message! (PBMP)
"whatsoever a man soweth" (is it alive?)
Stuart Smally Anyone? (or Frank'N) Sign?
(Mess N w/ # sines) [!(fn)4]
+( )leap from (fn)footnote I to III.
12-18-12 "buying a stairway" : (fn*) tba 2nd line: figures of speech
BTW: It's official. My Android(LG), may it Rest in Peace.(Optimus software repair failed).
12-5-12 Joke of the Year!
ALSO Re:"time" will expire.
time= (b.s.) "will+expire"
a, b(Reading between the lines.), c(Avian update), d(4g?), e.(?) [OW!](local sports)
12-3-12 Fiddle Sticks
(under Kant-struction)
[[That's the ticket! But this is a preemptive read. Support for raising taxes on the rich even runs over the barrier Republicans have constructed with their new minority of obstruction, except for their "arithmetic" and Twain. Actually the link at TED did not cover the error that is made when comparing percentiles with shares, or per capita with any tiles and individuals with dollars. Where4, there is more money in the top 1% therefore the top 1% are going to be paying a greater share of the taxes. Not to be competing with TED, but that means a progressive tax will look more unfair the more unfair income distribution is, unless you have a regressive tax.]]
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
What the Beck?
[Under-De(con)struction.]
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
Monday, November 12, 2007
Proof of Process?
I feel that there is now mathematical proof of my PBMP.
[Power Broker Mountain Project]
While math is not my discipline, it is only a tool of a mental process in dealing with the physical world.
As I have been so bold to note the 3 words preceding in bold, what follows is everthing else.
In fact the fourth point is the riddle itself. The point, the process, the structure and the dynamics?
Everything is give and take, the rest is the result and the reason. I don't know where that came from, but where are we going?
Is it any wonder that there are 3 branches of government, so it is written? Just what is the bottom line? Is not justice the point? And where are the people, not to mention the press and the law?
The Riddle Solved?
The Riddled Foundational Perspective?
[Power Broker Mountain Project]
While math is not my discipline, it is only a tool of a mental process in dealing with the physical world.
As I have been so bold to note the 3 words preceding in bold, what follows is everthing else.
In fact the fourth point is the riddle itself. The point, the process, the structure and the dynamics?
Everything is give and take, the rest is the result and the reason. I don't know where that came from, but where are we going?
Is it any wonder that there are 3 branches of government, so it is written? Just what is the bottom line? Is not justice the point? And where are the people, not to mention the press and the law?
The Riddle Solved?
The Riddled Foundational Perspective?
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Geometry of Purpose
Belated Congratulations for Fives Years
on Permanent Defense
Celebrating 5 years of facing the offensive likes of the Right,
and the offensive on the government and the middle class by
the likes of those like Tim Eyman.
Not that "3 strikes yer out" * does not work for baseball or should not be used to put repeat offenders in jail. It is too bad that at that rate Eyman is not at least out of the initiative business.
Geometry? Well there is the baseball diamond,
and then there is my paradigm I call The Power Broker Mountain Project [PBMP].
But I am thinking more of the parallel efforts which are being made not always in touch with each other, but headed in the same direction. My recent refocus on the local, means finetuning the approaches.
Two related efforts:
Not wanting to do justice to Culture Warrior Bill O'Reilly, I have coined, borrowed or claimed the position of Cultural Physicist, where everything matters. This effort led me to checking on an Internet parable (scroll down to The Tomato Company) and found the following Global Intelligence Briefing for CEOs found at The Braden Files by one Herb Meyer who by one American Thinker: "knocks the ball out of the park, explaining concisely and clearly the nature of the challenges facing Western Civilization."
And if I may connect more dots(and the ball park metaphor was not what I was going for) but I recall my poems on these parallels of sorts(the likes of who come to mind).
Right Face Left Faith
Great minds think alike
But being alike does not make right
Being right may make might
But more important is thinking
Right?
Being right is more likely
Why great minds will think alike
Thinking may not be so likely
In those that just think might
Right.
Faith is nowhere near alike
The truth that others think is might
Faith is might and more like maybe
Unless you only think it's right
Not maybe!
The physicist point?
Unified Poem
Everything
is but
a Wave
between
perspectives
in Time
and Space
Now to continue the path, and thanks again for the work of Andrew Villeneuve and Permanent Defense.
* just another initiative as segue
on Permanent Defense
Celebrating 5 years of facing the offensive likes of the Right,
and the offensive on the government and the middle class by
the likes of those like Tim Eyman.
Not that "3 strikes yer out" * does not work for baseball or should not be used to put repeat offenders in jail. It is too bad that at that rate Eyman is not at least out of the initiative business.
Geometry? Well there is the baseball diamond,
and then there is my paradigm I call The Power Broker Mountain Project [PBMP].
But I am thinking more of the parallel efforts which are being made not always in touch with each other, but headed in the same direction. My recent refocus on the local, means finetuning the approaches.
Two related efforts:
Not wanting to do justice to Culture Warrior Bill O'Reilly, I have coined, borrowed or claimed the position of Cultural Physicist, where everything matters. This effort led me to checking on an Internet parable (scroll down to The Tomato Company) and found the following Global Intelligence Briefing for CEOs found at The Braden Files by one Herb Meyer who by one American Thinker: "knocks the ball out of the park, explaining concisely and clearly the nature of the challenges facing Western Civilization."
And if I may connect more dots(and the ball park metaphor was not what I was going for) but I recall my poems on these parallels of sorts(the likes of who come to mind).
Right Face Left Faith
Great minds think alike
But being alike does not make right
Being right may make might
But more important is thinking
Right?
Being right is more likely
Why great minds will think alike
Thinking may not be so likely
In those that just think might
Right.
Faith is nowhere near alike
The truth that others think is might
Faith is might and more like maybe
Unless you only think it's right
Not maybe!
The physicist point?
Unified Poem
Everything
is but
a Wave
between
perspectives
in Time
and Space
Now to continue the path, and thanks again for the work of Andrew Villeneuve and Permanent Defense.
* just another initiative as segue
Friday, February 01, 2013
FOOTNOTES FEBRUARY 2013
2-1-13 Trilemmas
and Cultural Calculus :
Fishkin's http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/uploads/papers2011/Bamfield.pdf, Trilemma http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/410-pol/pojman-outline.htm, 4M Try Lemmings,
in tent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma, Mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics,
... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/economy/11view.html?_r=0,
? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics, ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_paradox,
easy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetralemma, at http://www.thelogician.net/3b_buddhist_illogic/3b_chapter_01.htm,
least http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=16f6647f676b31bf8e738901daabc68a&threadid=1927,
loosely http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=tetrahedron+of+will,
drafting http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next+,
un- http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next,
M http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1,
bedding http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=godliness,
tan http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/JohnHenryLG/posts/484801448229006?comment_id=5254201&offset=0&total_comments=13,
gent http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/suzette.sommer.9/posts/4281975535675?comment_id=57783597&offset=0&total_comments=29 *,
shall http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/07/david-and-goliath.html,
2-4-13 *source or 4moolah 4 the platonic 4M.
2-4-13 Quoth the...
Brackets and the Debt Clock under the "birds"(sc)
not : (b.s pen+dull+em) a Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em (sc), b Failure is always (sc), c Go Left Young Man! , d Slippery Slope (sc).
else: (b.s. poe) Fair and Balanced... (sc)
2-5-13 Flack...Oh
and blame : War on Tea Party?
gaming. (b.s. share+n+angle) Mitt's BO*Son, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger", Try Lemmings, Bring It On!, Cautious Black Friday!!!!, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, "FACT: References To Al Qaeda Were Removed To Protect National Security ...", War of the Skirts, The Hope'd4 Campaign, Who Let the Dogs Out?, Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S. .
2-11-13 Owe(b.s)= Post-Pyth, Post-Pyth, Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (d'oh=sc),Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? / OW=?(under al gore rhythm of pyth)4 later search or earlier brackets ! (Ctrl F "hood")
2-12-13 update, *FP4*, *FP3*, LEGEND PAGE, Format Change , Updates
2-12-13 Carpe Diem! Seize the Day? Latin 4...
2-13-13 D-Day *seams* = pun on *sowing* seems to thread in Lincoln and Darwin's birthday. Further, I should let you work it "into the grand picture of how things work".(FP2)
2-14-13 SOTU label/[**] & subheading edit after Tea Kettle Sports[!]
TKS[!]: Fry/Pan{L} pun on gaming politics.(OW) you(sc) Hint: NCAA/Olypics/CAPitalization[!]
(b.s.)"PBMP" A., B.What the Beck? (sc), C. Follow-up and Flip-Flop (sc) D. Follow-up and Flip-Flop E. Proof of Process? F. Looking Back, and Moving On. (sc) G. Geometry of Purpose (sc) N F L [!] (F P too?)
2-15-13 HAPPY V-DAY! Note the anachronism of con sciousness & science.
2-18-13 Technical Difficulties! "Where": A. Follow-up (sc) , B. What Obama can't say. (sc), C. What the Beck? (sc) / "inter": Score Won... / "tubes": A. As the Inner Tubes (sc) , B. Table of Contents (Senator)
** "Rush"(pun) / "ah!": A. WTF?, B. The Hope, C. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right. (sc)
"foundations": A. Science Fiction Writers, B. Four More Years!, C. Slash Segue (sc), D. Notes from Al-Qaeda .
2-19-13 Splitting Rails... to
"Share": Technical Difficulties!
"'n": HAPPY V-DAY!
"Angles.": Garry Wills "(c)atholicism" The Cycle
"Not ": (b.s.)"yogurt" C. Pop Yogurt[!]
"just": Harvard class on Tarantino.
"President's": ladders of opportunity
"pastime": Three Shed Monte
2-23-13: OW? Unspinning Charlotte! 6., 5.(Wills), 4.Future Bubble?, 3.(b.s.), 2., 1. Gnaught ? [FP2]
2-26-13 under(stands?) or PEG legs?
Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012, Simon says... , The History of B.S.,
What the Beck? BS-Table?
2-28-12 ...SCrolls: Lap Top? No Tab Let's. Krauthammer / Walsh (Breaking Bread?)(FP3)
Fishkin's http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/uploads/papers2011/Bamfield.pdf, Trilemma http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/410-pol/pojman-outline.htm, 4M Try Lemmings,
in tent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma, Mean http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics,
... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/economy/11view.html?_r=0,
? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics, ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_paradox,
easy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetralemma, at http://www.thelogician.net/3b_buddhist_illogic/3b_chapter_01.htm,
least http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=16f6647f676b31bf8e738901daabc68a&threadid=1927,
loosely http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=tetrahedron+of+will,
drafting http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next+,
un- http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next,
M http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1,
bedding http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=godliness,
tan http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/JohnHenryLG/posts/484801448229006?comment_id=5254201&offset=0&total_comments=13,
gent http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/suzette.sommer.9/posts/4281975535675?comment_id=57783597&offset=0&total_comments=29 *,
shall http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/07/david-and-goliath.html,
2-4-13 *source or 4moolah 4 the platonic 4M.
2-4-13 Quoth the...
Brackets and the Debt Clock under the "birds"(sc)
not : (b.s pen+dull+em) a Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em (sc), b Failure is always (sc), c Go Left Young Man! , d Slippery Slope (sc).
else: (b.s. poe) Fair and Balanced... (sc)
2-5-13 Flack...Oh
and blame : War on Tea Party?
gaming. (b.s. share+n+angle) Mitt's BO*Son, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger", Try Lemmings, Bring It On!, Cautious Black Friday!!!!, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, "FACT: References To Al Qaeda Were Removed To Protect National Security ...", War of the Skirts, The Hope'd4 Campaign, Who Let the Dogs Out?, Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S. .
2-11-13 Owe(b.s)= Post-Pyth, Post-Pyth, Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (d'oh=sc),Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? / OW=?(under al gore rhythm of pyth)4 later search or earlier brackets ! (Ctrl F "hood")
2-12-13 update, *FP4*, *FP3*, LEGEND PAGE, Format Change , Updates
2-12-13 Carpe Diem! Seize the Day? Latin 4...
2-13-13 D-Day *seams* = pun on *sowing* seems to thread in Lincoln and Darwin's birthday. Further, I should let you work it "into the grand picture of how things work".(FP2)
2-14-13 SOTU label/[**] & subheading edit after Tea Kettle Sports[!]
TKS[!]: Fry/Pan{L} pun on gaming politics.(OW) you(sc) Hint: NCAA/Olypics/CAPitalization[!]
(b.s.)"PBMP" A., B.What the Beck? (sc), C. Follow-up and Flip-Flop (sc) D. Follow-up and Flip-Flop E. Proof of Process? F. Looking Back, and Moving On. (sc) G. Geometry of Purpose (sc) N F L [!] (F P too?)
2-15-13 HAPPY V-DAY! Note the anachronism of con sciousness & science.
2-18-13 Technical Difficulties! "Where": A. Follow-up (sc) , B. What Obama can't say. (sc), C. What the Beck? (sc) / "inter": Score Won... / "tubes": A. As the Inner Tubes (sc) , B. Table of Contents (Senator)
** "Rush"(pun) / "ah!": A. WTF?, B. The Hope, C. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right. (sc)
"foundations": A. Science Fiction Writers, B. Four More Years!, C. Slash Segue (sc), D. Notes from Al-Qaeda .
2-19-13 Splitting Rails... to
"Share": Technical Difficulties!
"'n": HAPPY V-DAY!
"Angles.": Garry Wills "(c)atholicism" The Cycle
"Not ": (b.s.)"yogurt" C. Pop Yogurt[!]
"just": Harvard class on Tarantino.
"President's": ladders of opportunity
"pastime": Three Shed Monte
2-23-13: OW? Unspinning Charlotte! 6., 5.(Wills), 4.Future Bubble?, 3.(b.s.), 2., 1. Gnaught ? [FP2]
2-26-13 under(stands?) or PEG legs?
Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012, Simon says... , The History of B.S.,
What the Beck? BS-Table?
2-28-12 ...SCrolls: Lap Top? No Tab Let's. Krauthammer / Walsh (Breaking Bread?)(FP3)
Monday, May 14, 2007
Looking Back, and Moving On.
Thanks for Thom Hartmann reference to Naomi Klein Year Zero
A few years later,something I just googled up on the Unified Model of Reality which Bush violates. [America's Darwin Awards and a Philosophy Assignment
by Martin Schönfeld / Commondreams.org]
Which fits my PBMP "Power Broker Mountain Project" which is about how things work and it is not just "trickle down". The three branches of government are just one example of how things should work and what it is about. The point is progress and the people. You can't "trickle down" till you get there and try getting there without the system (structure, environment, culture) and other people.
The points of my "Tetrahedron Model of Reality" is basically the fields of physics, philosophy, and psychology which represent forces, thoughts and feelings but the point is the big project.
And now John Nichols: "Bush may have been wrong about war presidents being popular." On "The Genius of Impeachment".
Enough for now, I have my own reality to work on, for the time being.
A few years later,something I just googled up on the Unified Model of Reality which Bush violates. [America's Darwin Awards and a Philosophy Assignment
by Martin Schönfeld / Commondreams.org]
Which fits my PBMP "Power Broker Mountain Project" which is about how things work and it is not just "trickle down". The three branches of government are just one example of how things should work and what it is about. The point is progress and the people. You can't "trickle down" till you get there and try getting there without the system (structure, environment, culture) and other people.
The points of my "Tetrahedron Model of Reality" is basically the fields of physics, philosophy, and psychology which represent forces, thoughts and feelings but the point is the big project.
And now John Nichols: "Bush may have been wrong about war presidents being popular." On "The Genius of Impeachment".
Enough for now, I have my own reality to work on, for the time being.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)